The spike effect of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines on blood pressure.

Among the various comorbidities potentially worsening the clinical outcome in patients hospitalized for the acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), hypertension is one of the most prevalent. However, the basic mechanisms underlying the development of severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among hypertensive patients remain undefined and the direct association of hypertension with outcome in COVID-19 is still a field of debate. Experimental and clinical data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection promotes a rise in blood pressure (BP) during the acute phase of infection. Acute increase in BP and high in-hospital BP variability may be tied with acute organ damage and a worse outcome in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. In this context, the failure of the counter-regulatory renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) axis is a potentially relevant mechanism involved in the raise in BP. It is well recognized that the efficient binding of the Spike (S) protein to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors mediates the virus entry into cells. Internalization of ACE2, downregulation and malfunction predominantly due to viral occupation, dysregulates the protective RAS axis with increased generation and activity of angiotensin (Ang) II and reduced formation of Ang1,7. Thus, the imbalance between Ang II and Ang1-7 can directly contribute to excessively rise BP in the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A similar mechanism has been postulated to explain the raise in BP following COVID-19 vaccination ("Spike Effect" similar to that observed during the infection of SARS-CoV-2). S proteins produced upon vaccination have the native-like mimicry of SARS-CoV-2 S protein's receptor binding functionality and prefusion structure and free-floating S proteins released by the destroyed cells previously targeted by vaccines may interact with ACE2 of other cells, thereby promoting ACE2 internalization and degradation, and loss of ACE2 activities.

COVID-19, vaccines and deficiency of ACE2 and other angiotensinases. Closing the loop on the "Spike effect".

The role of a dysregulated renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is well recognized. The imbalance between angiotensin II (Ang II) and Angiotensin1-7 (Ang1,7) caused by the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors exerts a pivotal role on the clinical picture and outcome of COVID-19. ACE2 receptors are not the exclusive angiotensinases in nature. Other angiotensinases (PRCP, and POP) have the potential to limit the detrimental effects of the interactions between ACE2 and the Spike proteins. In the cardiovascular disease continuum, ACE2 activity tends to decrease, and POP/PRCP activity to increase, from the health status to advanced deterioration of the cardiovascular system. The failure of the counter-regulatory RAS axis during the acute phase of COVID-19 is characterized by a decrease of ACE2 expression coupled to unchanged activity of other angiotensinases, therefore failing to limit the accumulation of Ang II. COVID-19 vaccines increase the endogenous synthesis of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. Once synthetized, the free-floating spike proteins circulate in the blood, interact with ACE2 receptors and resemble the pathological features of SARS-CoV-2 ("Spike effect" of COVID-19 vaccines). It has been noted that an increased catalytic activity of POP/PRCP is typical in elderly individuals with comorbidities or previous cardiovascular events, but not in younger people. Thus, the adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccination associated with Ang II accumulation are generally more common in younger and healthy subjects. Understanding the relationships between different mechanisms of Ang II cleavage and accumulation offers the opportunity to close the pathophysiological loop between the risk of progression to severe forms of COVID-19 and the potential adverse events of vaccination.

Rethinking the Role of the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Pandemic Era of SARS-CoV-2.

After assessing the levels of spread and severity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, academic literature focused on the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [...].

Cardiac complications of COVID-19 vaccination: now we know more.

The proliferation of good quality observational studies on the potential adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination has greatly increased our knowledge on myocarditis and pericarditis, and also, more recently, on arterial hypertension. According to some recent studies, the incidence of a significant increase in blood pressure after COVID-19 vaccination is about 3.2% (95% CI: 1.62-6.21). The incidence of serious hypertensive emergencies or stage III hypertension has been reported as 0.6%. It is well known that the 'spike protein' of the Sars-CoV-2 virus, the synthesis of which is induced by vaccines, binds to ACE2 receptors, inducing their migration towards the inside of the cell. This would result in a lack of ACE2 activity on cell surfaces and therefore a relative deficiency of angiotensin1-7 with a relative excess of angiotensin II, which could explain, at least in part, the blood pressure increases. Regarding myo-pericarditis, there is evidence that the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination over non-vaccination remain preponderant in terms of prevented hospitalizations and serious complications of COVID-19, compared with the risk of developing myocarditis. In the age group most at risk of COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis (12-29 years), for every 100 000 vaccinated, compared to about four more cases of myocarditis we have 56 fewer hospitalizations, 13.8 admissions to intensive care and 0.6 fewer deaths. Several studies have shown that post vaccine myocarditis/pericarditis are generally short-lasting phenomena with favourable clinically course.

Blood Pressure Increase following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Overview and Meta-Analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines proved a strong clinical efficacy against symptomatic or moderate/severe COVID-19 and are considered the most promising approach for curbing the pandemic. However, some questions regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines have been recently raised. Among adverse events to vaccines and despite a lack of signal during phase III clinical trials, an increase in blood pressure (BP) after COVID-19 vaccination has been reported as a potential adverse reaction. We systematically analyze this topic and undertook a meta-analysis of available data to estimate the proportion of patients with abnormal BP or raise in BP after vaccination. Six studies entered the final analysis. Overall, studies accrued 357,387 subjects with 13,444 events of abnormal or increased BP. After exclusion of outlier studies, the pooled estimated proportion of abnormal/increased BP after vaccination was 3.20% (95% CI: 1.62-6.21). Proportions of cases of stage III hypertension or hypertensive urgencies and emergencies was 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1% to 5.1%). In conclusion, abnormal BP is not rare after COVID-19 vaccination, but the basic mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear and require further research.

Renin Angiotensin System Blockers and Risk of Mortality in Hypertensive Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: An Italian Registry.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether exposure to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modifiers affects the severity of the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because most of the available studies are retrospective. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of exposure to RAS modifiers (either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACE-Is] or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) in a prospective study of hypertensive patients with COVID-19. We analyzed data from 566 patients (mean age 75 years, 54% males, 162 ACE-Is users, and 147 ARBs users) hospitalized in five Italian hospitals. The study used systematic prospective data collection according to a pre-specified protocol. All-cause mortality during hospitalization was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients died during hospitalization. Exposure to RAS modifiers was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of in-hospital mortality when compared to other BP-lowering strategies (odds ratio [OR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32 to 0.90, p = 0.019). Exposure to ACE-Is was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality when compared with patients not treated with RAS modifiers (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.20, p = 0.172). Conversely, ARBs users showed a 59% lower risk of death (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.84, p = 0.016) even after allowance for several prognostic markers, including age, oxygen saturation, occurrence of severe hypotension during hospitalization, and lymphocyte count (adjusted OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.80, p = 0.012). The discontinuation of RAS modifiers during hospitalization did not exert a significant effect (p = 0.515). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study indicates that exposure to ARBs reduces mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

[Hypertension after COVID-19 vaccination]. / Ipertensione dopo vaccinazione anti-COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapidly spread across the world, killing more than 4 million individuals globally, with 240 million individuals being confirmed by laboratory tests. Among different therapeutic strategies to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccines are the most promising approach for curbing the pandemic. They elicit an immune neutralizing response and thus offer protection against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, some questions regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines have been raised and based on sparse reports of severe systemic reactions after vaccination. Among these, evidences on the potential effect of vaccination on the acute rise in blood pressure have been recently accrued. Approved vaccines in Europe increase the endogenous synthesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike proteins from a variety of cells. Once synthetized in the cells reached by the vaccine, the Spike proteins first assemble in the cytoplasm and then migrate to the cell surface to protrude with a native-like conformation. Spike proteins are recognized by the immune system which rapidly develops an immune response. Furthermore, the Spike proteins assembled in the cells which are eventually destroyed by the immune response circulate in the blood as free-floating forms. Free-floating Spike proteins may interact with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors leading to internalization, degradation, and dysregulation of the catalytic activities of these receptors. The consequent loss of ACE2 receptor activity leads to a rapid drop in the generation of angiotensin1,7 resulting from inactivation of angiotensin II. The imbalance between angiotensin II (overactivity) and of angiotensin1,7 (deficiency) might play a role in the genesis of acute elevation in blood pressure.

Cardiac and pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia: a case series

Aims Although the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) may cause an acute multiorgan syndrome (COVID-19), data are emerging on mid- and long-term sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia. Since no study has hitherto investigated the role of both cardiac and pulmonary ultrasound techniques in detecting such sequelae, this study aimed at evaluating these simple diagnostic tools to appraise the cardiopulmonary involvement occurring after COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods and results Twenty-nine patients fully recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia were considered at our centre. On admission, all patients underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation. Compression ultrasound (CUS) and lung ultrasound (LUS) were also performed. Finally, in each patient, pathological findings detected on LUS were correlated with the pulmonary involvement occurring after COVID-19 pneumonia as assessed on thoracic computed tomography (CT). Out of 29 patients (mean age 70 ± 10 years old;M 69%), prior cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities were recorded in 22 (76%). Twenty-seven patients (93%) were in sinus rhythm and two (7%) in atrial fibrillation. ECG repolarization abnormalities were extremely common (93%) and reflected the high prevalence of pericardial involvement on TTE (86%). Likewise, pleural abnormalities were frequently observed (66%). TTE signs of left and right ventricular dysfunction were reported in two patients only, but values of systolic pulmonary artery pressure were abnormal in 16 (55%) despite absence of prior comorbidities in 44% of them. Regarding LUS evaluation, most patients displayed abnormal values of diaphragmatic thickness and excursion (93%) which well correlated with the high prevalence (76%) of on pathological findings on CT scan. CUS ruled out deep vein thrombosis in all patients. Conclusions Data on cardiopulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia are scarce. In our study, simple diagnostic tools (TTE and LUS) proved clinically useful for detection of cardiopulmonary involvement after COVID-19 pneumonia.

Myopericarditis after SARS-CoV-2 MRNA vaccination: casual or causal relationship?

Aims Myopericarditis have been reported as rare event after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2. However, these data referred to the month of May 2021, when only a few people under the age of 30 had been vaccinated. The aim was to report cases diagnosed with myopericarditis short after vaccination admitted to our hospital. Methods and results An observational study was performed recording all cases of patients (pts) hospitalized for myopericarditis which occurred within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. From June to August 2021, 12 pts were hospitalized for myopericarditis;four of them (33%) were young male pts (29 ± 12 years old) with no history of CVDs or SARS-CoV-2 infection but with a recent second dose of Covid-19 mRNA-1273 vaccine (mean interval from the injection 3 ± 2 days). ECG showed diffuse ST-segment elevation without specularity (Figure 1). SARS-CoV-2 molecular swab tested negative;laboratory (lab) test showed a slight increase of white blood cells (11 267 ± 1047 108/l) and a marked increase of C-reactive protein (78 ± 79 mg/l), troponin T (179 ± 179 ng/l), and Nt-proBNP (876 ± 198 ng/l);transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal left ventricle ejection fraction (mean 55 ± 3%) and in one case only mild pericardial effusion;chest X-ray showed pleural effusion in one case only. Pts were then hospitalized for an average of 7 ± 2 days and an anti-inflammatory therapy based on acetylsalicylic acid and colchicine (in one case also with cortisone) was established. In the following days, pts gradually recovered and were discharged home. After 10 days, two pts underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) revealing myocardial oedema and late gadolinium enhancement in the subepicardial and midmyocardium, along the basal and mid-apical lateral wall;due to relative contraindications, the same examination was scheduled later for the other two pts. These cases deserve specific considerations on the causal relationship between heart inflammation and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Among the various pathophysiological hypothesis there is the high levels of antibodies that mRNA vaccines can generate in young male subjects or the consideration of mRNA as a natural adjuvant capable of activating disproportionately the innate immune system;in both cases, the result is an immune overreaction that can affect various organs including the heart. Conclusions Although the number of our cases is small and all pts recovered in a short time, the timing of symptoms and the similarities in clinical findings and lab characteristics call for further investigations.

Acute coronary syndromes after healing from COVID-19: report of the initial observation

Aims Severe pulmonary complications are well described in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have been documented as well. Most patients (pts) recover quickly;nevertheless, the potential long-term cardiovascular sequalae of COVID-19 remain currently unknown. The aim was to report cases of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) after healing from COVID-19 and their features at coronary angiography;secondary purpose was to hypothesize the underlying mechanisms. Methods and results A retrospective study was performed by acquiring data from the electronic medical record. From January to June 2021, four hypertensive pts (64 ± 17 years old;three males) with no history of CVDs and previous symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean interval from first positive molecular swab 47 ± 32 days;all recovered after 15 days with double negative swab) were admitted to the emergency department for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (3 anterior and one inferior). At admission, the SARS-CoV-2 molecular swab tested negative, left ventricle ejection fraction was 42 ± 12%, troponin T and Nt-proBNP values were 47 ± 24 ng/l and 1180 ± 978 ng/l, respectively. Emergency coronary angiography showed single-vessel acute thrombotic occlusion (in three cases of the anterior descending artery and in one case of the right coronary artery), with no evidence of atherosclerotic disease. Because of the high thrombotic burden, in all cases a mechanical thrombus aspiration system was used, tirofiban infusion started and no balloon angioplasty or drug-eluting stent implantation was necessary (Figures A–D). After 72 h, a second SARS-CoV-2 molecular swab tested also negative. In the following days, the pts gradually recovered and they were discharged home. Conclusions These cases deserve specific considerations both on the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the ACS possibly related to SARS-CoV-2 and on the subsequent long-term sequelae. Among various pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed, the high affinity of the spike protein for the angiotensin converting enzyme two receptor (expressed by both cardiac and endothelial cells) could explain direct cardiac viral infection and vasculitis with possible development of thrombosis. The latter could contribute both to acute and long-term cardiac sequelae, even months after the acute infection, configuring a sort of ‘cardiac post-Covid syndrome’. Whether and how long this status persists, making COVID-19 a risk factor for subsequent CVDs, is still an unresolved question. In this regard, continuous monitoring of these pts and larger future studies will be essential.

Combined Use of Electrocardiography and Ultrasound to Detect Cardiac and Pulmonary Involvement after Recovery from COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may cause an acute multiorgan syndrome (coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)), data are emerging on mid- and long-term sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia. Since no study has hitherto investigated the role of both cardiac and pulmonary ultrasound techniques in detecting such sequelae, this study aimed at evaluating these simple diagnostic tools to appraise the cardiopulmonary involvement after COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients fully recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia were considered at our centre. On admission, all patients underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation. Compression ultrasound (CUS) and lung ultrasound (LUS) were also performed. Finally, in each patient, pathological findings detected on LUS were correlated with the pulmonary involvement occurring after COVID-19 pneumonia, as assessed on thoracic computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: Out of 29 patients (mean age 70 ± 10 years; males 69%), prior cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities were recorded in 22 (76%). Twenty-seven patients (93%) were in sinus rhythm and two (7%) in atrial fibrillation. Persistence of ECG abnormalities from the acute phase was common, and nonspecific repolarisation abnormalities (93%) reflected the high prevalence of pericardial involvement on TTE (86%). Likewise, pleural abnormalities were frequently observed (66%). TTE signs of left and right ventricular dysfunction were reported in two patients, and values of systolic pulmonary artery pressure were abnormal in 16 (55%, despite the absence of prior comorbidities in 44% of them). Regarding LUS evaluation, most patients displayed abnormal values of diaphragmatic thickness and excursion (93%), which correlated well with the high prevalence (76%) of pathological findings on CT scan. CUS ruled out deep vein thrombosis in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Data on cardiopulmonary involvement after COVID-19 pneumonia are scarce. In our study, simple diagnostic tools (TTE and LUS) proved clinically useful for the detection of cardiopulmonary complications after COVID-19 pneumonia.

Pharmacotherapy for hypertensive urgency and emergency in COVID-19 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is a common chronic disorder in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Furthermore, an exaggerated cardiovascular response with persistently raised blood pressure during hospitalization seems independently associated with in-hospital all-cause mortality, intensive care unit admission and heart failure. However, the real burden of elevated blood pressure during the acute phase of COVID-19 remains undefined. AREAS COVERED: The authors review the available evidence on the pharmacotherapy for the treatment of acute elevations in blood pressure (including hypertensive urgency and emergency) in COVID-19 patients. EXPERT OPINION: Acute elevations in blood pressure and unstable in-hospital blood pressure may be associated with organ damage and worse outcome in patients with COVID-19. In this setting, hypertensive emergencies require immediate reduction in blood pressure through intravenous treatment according to specific features and goals. Conversely, hypertensive urgencies usually require solely oral treatment. Diuretics, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers may be of benefit in treating COVID-19 patients with elevated blood pressure values.